If We Could See All The Electromagnetic Radiation Waves Around Us Would We Still Accept Microwave Technology As Safe?

microwave-brain

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Microwaves and their consumer-unrealized effects are so pervasive, currently we live in a “sea of invisible non-ionizing radiation,” which has adverse health implications regardless of what ICNIRP and the microwave tech industries, their lobbyists and trade associations claim in their ‘science’ propaganda.  The chart below ought to indicate just how ubiquitous those invisible ‘ghosts of future health problems’ really are.

microwave-image-1

Source

Here’s another graphic showing where some of the more common ‘smart’ technologies fit into the spectrum.

Source

 

Note what the American Cancer Society has to say about non-ionizing radiation:

Radiofrequency (RF) radiation, which includes radio waves and microwaves, is at the low-energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is a type of non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to ionize (remove charged particles such as electrons). RF radiation has lower energy than some other types of non-ionizing radiation, like visible light and infrared, but it has higher energy than extremely low-frequency (ELF) radiation. [1]

[It’s not so low according to the above chart.  Microwave RFs are mid-range leaning toward higher ranges!  Do you see that square box under cell phone range?]

If RF radiation is absorbed in large enough amounts by materials containing water, such as food, fluids, and body tissues, it can produce heat. This can lead to burns and tissue damage. Although RF radiation does not cause cancer by damaging DNA in cells the way ionizing radiation does, there has been concern that some forms of non-ionizing radiation might have biological effects that could result in cancer in some circumstances. [1][One of the seriously grave deficits of microwave vested interests that propels the FCC and other government agencies in their microwave tolerance ranges is a deliberate failure and ‘scientific’ malfeasance in not recognizing non-thermal radiation waves (documented by independent and academic research in over 70% of studies) emitted by all microwave-operated appliances, towers, etc.   Note the ACS talks about heat, which is the only adverse reaction the microwave industry recognizes called “thermal radiation waves.”]

Man-made RF radiation is used for many different things, such as

  • Broadcasting radio and television signals
  • Transmitting signals from cordless telephones, cell phones and cell phone towers, satellite phones, and 2-way radios
  • Radar
  • WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Cooking food (in a microwave oven)
  • Heating body tissue to destroy them in medical procedures [that should be a clue!]
  • “Welding” pieces of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) using certain machines
  • Millimeter wave scanners (a type of full body scanner used for security screening) [1]

[Take special note of the “heating body tissue” above!  Microwaves interact with water and the human body is about 60% water with specific organs containing more, e.g., brain and heart, 73%.  All those innovative smart things we’ve become addicted to supply unseen microwaves and their consequential radiation waves to the human organism.]

However, most consumers really do not understand the ramifications surrounding non-ionizing radiation sources and waves.  In my opinion, there’s an article “Ghosts and spectra: The invisible world of WiFi signal bombardment” which, from the research I’ve done, seems misleading and not factual about Wi-Fi and EMF radiation wavelengths.  The photos in the article represent something else other than Wi-Fi, since that radiation is a ‘scatter’ effect for users to be able to access it “out of thin air” wherever it is available.  Something else probably is going on in those photos [e.g., lower dimensional; astral; or other spectra manifestations] or it’s ‘photo shop’ to create a special effect.  However, I don’t agree the photos represent Wi-Fi/EMF/RF radiation waves.

I’ve had people concerned about non-thermal radiation waves health effects contact me, especially experts in the field of EMFs/RFs/ELFs to say many groups claim to understand EMF but actually don’t.  According to one professional, “We know what radar, EMF, radiation patterns look like.  There are near-field pattern analysis and far-field pattern analysis diagrams.  These patterns change with respect to the human body’s anatomical structure and other incident fields.”

Interestingly, an EMF professional, who used a CORNET ED88T electrosmog meter to take various readings in several metropolitan areas, including a hospital where radiation cancer treatments are given, reports, “In most metropolitan areas, the RF power density readings exceeded the meter’s maximum reading of 1.8 W/m 2.  The US guidelines have a maximum exposure of 6.33 W/m 2.  The proximity to cell towers and large business or shopping areas are where the meter was over the range. [What are shoppers being exposed to?]  The new computer systems in the hospitals, Wi-Fi everywhere, and other EMF generating sources make these places a good place to stay away from if you absolutely do not have to be there.  The poor nurses, doctors, and volunteers do not know what they are doing to themselves.  They are definitely in the fast lane.”

To the above information, that EMF professional added, “All one can do is pray for the people located near or within these areas of maximum power density.  Although, even in the other areas that indicate caution, the sclerotic effects on the body are still cumulative over time.  What we do for convenience is tragic.”

Getting back to the “Ghosts and spectra” article photos mentioned above, there was a poignant comment posted in the Comments section by Tannaberton Abacrombie Apr 7, 2017 at 5:30 am, which explains the hidden aspects seemingly kept deliberately hidden and not revealed to consumers:

The artwork is deceptive. It shows a mass of waves around a small point when it actually fills every space and attenuates according to the inverse square law. It is truly everywhere. When I worked on the phaseout of WW2 Radar sets used as repeaters, etc. on the Trans Canada Telephone System, we had strict limits as to how much exposure we could be subject to while working. It was a lot less than what we bathe in now and those sets were considered leaky. Tests were done every two years for leakage and small spikes in background radiation were fixed…now. So as you sit there one meter from your WI-FI router turn around every now and then so you won’t get the cancer all on one side.

Yes!  Cancer is one of the unfortunate adverse health effects from long-range exposures to microwaves, especially Wi-Fi and children.  Here are only a couple research papers connecting microwave EMFs with cancer; there are hundreds, if not thousands, more!

  1. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150724123928.html
    Clear connection between wireless devices and cancer, experts say
  2. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2015; 1 DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557

Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation.

From all the research I’ve done, it is my candid opinion consumers don’t know what kind of adverse health effects tiger-by-the-tail they have fallen in love with, but can’t seem to want to extricate themselves from its mesmerizing grips until they must, due either to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) issues or a litany of other health problems, including cancers.

Here’s what you can do.

Thursday, April 20, 2017, there will be a demonstration outside the FCC Offices (445 12th St SW, Washington, DC 20554) from 9:00 – 10:15 am to protest small cells beaming radiation into our homes 24/7, and to advocate/lobby for connecting all homes, schools, and businesses with safe, reliable, cyber-secure, fiber optic cables, the SAFEST technology to use systems-wide. You are encouraged also to attend the FCC’s open meeting, which will be held from 10:30 am to 12:30 pm.

References:

[1] Microwaves, Radio Waves, and Other Types of Radiofrequency Radiation
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/radiofrequency-radiation.html

Natural Blaze / CC SA-4.0 / eBook


Like Natural Blaze on Facebook – Follow on Twitter – FREE eBook

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

http://www.naturalblaze.com/nbcitation5.html

Uncovering the Mysteries of Medicinal Herbs

herbs-164642_640-1200x736

It’s no mystery: plants have been naturally curing people for millennia. In fact, most of the world’s population still relies on herbal remedies as opposed to stethoscopes and pharmacies. The problem is, as the medical industry has moved society further and further away from natural cures and preventions, the wisdom of how to use what herb to cure which ailment has become largely absent from common knowledge. But, it’s not that hard to unlock these riddles of old. Read on to uncover the mysteries of medicinal herbs.

Mystery Number One: Which Herbs are Medicinal?

Number one is tough. The answer is just about all of them. From basil to mint to oregano to sage, nearly every plant has a place on the medical spectrum. And, don’t for a minute just think of those fresh, green leafy things we buy at the supermarket (or the little shakers of dried leaves) because the idea of medicinal plants, let’s say herbs and spices, must and does stretch into leaves, bark, roots, flowers and seeds. So, we should include such famed health boosters like turmeric, garlic and ginger. You name it, you Google it, and it will be good for curing, combating or preventing something.

Some favorites:

  • Ginger: It’s the perfect take along for traveling. Good for upset stomach and motion sickness, both of which are likely to come.
  • Oregano Oil: Perfect to keep around for when you start to feel run down. Put a couple of drops in some orange juice to pep up the immune system.
  • Mint: It can be found just about anywhere, in abundance, for cheap or free, and it helps with indigestion, headaches, stress, depression, coughs, cancer and morning breath.

Mystery Number Two: How Do I Use Medicinal Herbs (and Spices)?

Well, there are many ways to use medicinal plants. Powders, pills, teas, tinctures, balms, oils, salves, ointments and just plain flavor enhancers for cooking — there is more than one way to get your daily dosage. But, the key is to get your daily dosage.

Unlike prescription medicines, herbal remedies work best as a preventative, something that gets added to your system on a daily basis. Also unlike prescription medicines, this regular usage is usually quite safe and with little side effect. Cold season on the way? Start getting some regular oregano. Know those joints are prone to creaking? Get more turmeric in your diet.

Generally speaking, if something internal ails, something will need to be ingested (save aroma therapy type stuff, like the smell of lavender easing stress). Then, if something is external, it’s probably best to start looking for or making some sort of cream or balm. Sometimes, it just takes wrapping something in a leaf for a while.

Some favorites:

  • Chamomile: Insomnia is annoying. The 2 a.m. stir, the tossing and turning. A good tea for sleeping means a lot the next day. Combine chamomile with lemongrass and mint — awesome.
  • Basil: One of the most common of herbs is also effective at providing a little energy, from the fresh smell of it to the rejuvenating flavor. Sprinkle it fresh on food on a lazy day or make a tea.
  • Citronella: That’s right. It’s an herb, and for those who’ve been around mosquitos and tiki torches, the name has probably popped up a time or two. I like it growing in the garden or hanging up everywhere.

*In the instance that there is already an illness, herbal remedies do work, but patients need to take concentrated doses, just as with prescription medicine. In other words, instead of a casual sprinkling of this or that on some soup, five or six strong teas a day might be necessary. Check out this long, long list (with links) to herbal remedies.

Mystery Number Three: Where Do I Get These Wonderful Things?

The best, perhaps most fun, alternative would be to try growing some in the backyard or on the kitchen windowsill. Many herbs are quite easy to grow. Some — mint, dandelion, clover — actually are notorious for coming on a little strong in the garden. Secondly, learn what remedies might be growing nearby already. Eat the Weeds is an incredible website for getting the lowdown on useful plants found in the cracks of sidewalks or tucked behind the rose bushes.

Secondly, to fill those more immediate needs, the Internet will suffice. This is the age of online shopping, whether that means bidding for collectable dolls on eBay or getting healthy with plant life. There are a plethora of sites that take orders and will deliver herbal remedies in many a form to the front door in a matter of days. Mountain Rose Herbs has a really quality selection.

Some parting words of inspiration:

  • Try it. Don’t let a lack of know-how scare you off. It’s as simple as searching which herb to use and how. It’s cheaper and greener than visiting the doctor for a sore throat or what have you.
  • Drink herbal tea all the time. Drink it hot, cold, mixed and matched. It counts towards those eight glasses of water a day but adds a medicinal punch.
  • Discover what’s around you. Start investigating the plants in your garden. They likely have a medical use, even the weeds. It’s incredible to find out what is naturally good for your body.

Same Old, Same Old! Agenda Of Neverending Wars Is Evident, as Trump Attacks a Sovereign Nation, Killing 14

Tomahawk_Missile_fired_from_US_Destroyers

The Trump Syria strike – an aggressive, preemptive, unprovoked US attack on Syria which completely violated international law and killed around 14 people (civilians) – was based on the same old lies used to justify virtually every attack, invasion and war in recent history.

Trump shocked many people by making the decision to launch 59 tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria, on the morning of April 6th, 2017, right after his administration (via the likes of Secretary of State Tillerson) had just recently stated that the US was no longer attempting regime change in Syria and that the US was no longer interested in trying to remove Assad.

In yet another flip-flop, Donald Trump – “President Inconsistent” – turned his back on months of non-interventionist campaigning by attacking a sovereign nation that posed no threat to the US.

In doing so, the MSM, which has for months been parroting the line that Trump was a Russian agent, all of a sudden praised Trump for his “beautiful” attacks.

But was the Trump Syria strike anything new, or have we literally seen this exact scenario before?

Trump Syria Strike Straight Out of NWO Playbook

To those paying attention, the Trump Syria strike is straight out of the New World Order playbook, line for line.

A “cruel dictator attacks his own people with chemical weapons” and the world’s beneficent bully superpower has to conduct a “humanitarian intervention” to save the “beautiful babies”.

Where have we heard the one before?

Oh yeah, just 4 years ago. Unlike other pretexts used to attack the nations like Iraq (where the lie was that Saddam had WMDs), the scriptwriters didn’t even bother to change the script from 2013 to 2017.

The villain is the same (Assad), the nation to be invaded is the same (Syria), the excuse is the same (tyrant attacking his own people) and the method is the same (chemical weapons). It’s a 2013 redux!

Declassified CIA Document Reveals Iraq War Had Zero Justification

The dark forces running the US Government and New Wold Order have got Trump literally reading the exact same script as Obama did 4 years ago. Are most people still too asleep to realize this obvious fact?

(By the way, if you think Trump cares about beautiful babies, you may want to consider why he is supporting the Saudis in their war against the Yemenis, whose beautiful babies are also getting killed.)

Individual citizens are subject to all sorts of requirements in a court of law to prove their cases, yet we now witness the ridiculous spectacle of US Ambassadors to the UN, such as Colin Powell and Nikki Haley, hold up vials of powder and shake photographs of dead children, to supposedly prove a case and justify the invasion of a sovereign nation and the slaughter of innocent people?

Is this really the state of humanity?

Fact Check Recall: in 2013, the UN Said the Rebels had the Chemical Weapons, not the Assad Government

Let’s do a quick fact check. When this scenario unfolded in 2013, the UN (United Nations) sent investigators who found sites inside of Syria that were used for chemical weapons.

However, the Syrian opposition rebels (funded by and aligned with the US-UK-NATO-Israel-Turkey-Gulf State alliance) were the ones controlling those sites!

UN investigator Carla del Ponte (a member of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria) concluded that she had “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof” that the “opponents” (rebels) were the ones using the nerve agent, and specifically stated that her panel had no “indication at all that the (authority of the) Syrian government had used chemical weapons.”

Another very important point to consider is that the US confirmed that, after the UN and US inspectors left Syria in 2013, there were no more chemical weapons left. The US, Russia and the international community confirmed that Assad gave them all up.

So are we supposed to believe that Assad suddenly gained more in the space of the last 4 years, despite the fact by doing so he would be putting his nation at the very real risk of being invaded by the strongest and most aggressive military in the world, who had already issued a “red line” ultimatum to him?

One-party state

Tulsi Gabbard had the guts to speak up against the Trump Syria strike. 
She has visited Syria and actually knows what is going on.

Who Benefits? Assad and Putin? Or the US, Israel and ISIS?

One of the most important questions for detectives and investigators is to ask “Cui bono” or “Who benefits”? It is very clear that Assad does not benefit from this attack.

Do you really think that Assad, after dealing with the invasion of his nation for at least 6 years (although foreign meddling in Syria goes back over 100 years), would suddenly attack his own people with chemical weapons?

Do you really think he would do this especially after he had been making such good progress militarily (in repelling ISIS) and diplomatically (to the point where Western leaders were dropping their “Assad must go” agenda)?

Given everything that has happened in the last 15 years with US aggression, for a Middle Eastern leader to attack his own citizens with chemical weapons would be crazy, and tantamount to an invitation to US forces to invade.

Such an attack would merely galvanize international opposition to the attacker, and ensure his or her fate would be sealed by invading NATO forces, now armed with a great excuse to exercise regime change.

Conversely, we see that ISIS has gained from this attack. This is a report from Al Masdar:

“The Islamic State (ISIL) forces in the eastern countryside of the Homs Governorate launched a powerful offensive this morning, a local military source informed Al-Masdar. Capitalizing on the U.S. missile strikes, the Islamic State stormed the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) checkpoints near the strategic town of Al-Furqalas.”

Supporting ISIS while pretending to fight them so that Assad could be toppled and Syria could be partitioned has always been the game plan.

trump-syria-strike-nikki-haley
Clueless Nikki Haley (another puppet trying to justify the Trump Syria strike): 
shaking around photographs at the UN doesn’t equal proof.

 

More Plausible Explanations for the Syrian Chemical “Attack”

There are far more plausible explanations for the Syrian chemical attack. This Global Research article lists some of them. The first is the possibility that Salafist terrorists released the chemicals into the air:

“A far more logical explanation, given the location, is that chemicals were released into the air by Salafist terrorists. The location of the alleged attack is an al-Qaeda-affiliated controlled area in Idlib province.

“It is from here that the Western-funded White Helmets operate. Rather conveniently, they were soon at the scene of the alleged attack without the necessary protective clothing being filmed hosing down victims.

“As these are the kinds of people who cut out and eat human organs as well as decapitate heads, they are unlikely to have any compunction in desisting from an opportunity to use Syrian civilians, including children and women, as a form of ‘war porn propaganda’ in order to garner public sympathy as the pretext for Western intervention.”

Alternatively, the site may have been attacked by the Syrian Air Force and the chemicals leaked out.

This is what the Russian are saying, along with journalist Tom Duggan and former DIA agent Patrick Donald:

“Syrian-based journalist, Tom Duggan, who has been living in the country for the last four years, claims no gas attack happened. Rather, he asserts that the Syrian air force destroyed a terrorist-owned and controlled chemical weapons factory mistaking it for an ammunition dump, and “the chemicals spilled out.”

This seems to be the most plausible explanation. Mr Duggan’s version is markedly similar to the analysis of former DIA colonel, Patrick Lang Donald who, on April 7, 2017 said:

“Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib.

Here is what happened:

The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.

The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.

The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site.

It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.

There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.

We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.””

We also have the opinion of former CIA agent Philip Geraldi, who has spent years exposing the CIA, Israel and other aspects of the NWO.

In an interview with Scott Horton, Geraldi states that he has military and intelligence sources who are “intimately familiar” with the situation who say that the narrative that Assad or Russia did it is bogus.

He believes the Russian narrative that Assad’s forces had bombed a storage facility (like Donald above).

Putin: More “Provocations” Are Planned in Syria

In a talk today with Italian President Sergio Mattarella, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has military intelligence that more of the same “provocations” (which some news sites are translating as “false flags”) are being planned. Putin also talked about how we’ve seen it all before.

Here is Putin in his own words:

“President Mattarella and I discussed it, and I told him that this reminds me strongly of the events in 2003, when the US representatives demonstrated at the UN Security Council session the presumed chemical weapons found in Iraq.

“The military campaign was subsequently launched in Iraq and it ended with the devastation of the country, the growth of the terrorist threat and the appearance of Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS] on the world stage.

The same thing is happening now. Their [Western] partners are nodding in agreement. Citing our wonderful comedy writers Ilf and Petrov – I want to say, “How boring, ladies!” We’ve seen it all before. (…)

“We have reports from multiple sources that other provocations [false flags] like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus. They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack.”

Interesting that Putin perceives the Trump Syria strike as basically Trump caving in to the NWO and MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) and how he mentions that Trump will be the first to be criticized in the American media if things go sour or awry.

Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Exposed As False Flag

May the Trump Syria Strike Serve as a Wakeup Call

The Trump Syria strike marks another sad week in world history, as we see leaders continually choosing to initiate violence with no justification to start potential wars.

It’s another reminder that the office of US presidency needs to be dismantled, for it is simply too much power for one individual to hold. It’s vindication for all those people warning what a mistake it was to put someone like Trump in charge, who has few firm principles by which he seems to abide.

It’s also a reminder that presidents are all to easily swayed, shaped, bribed and blackmailed into fulfilling the NWO agenda regardless of whatever peaceful and just ambitions they had before entering office.

Hopefully this whole incident, where around 14 innocent people were killed, can at least serve as a wake-up call to those who foolishly supported Trump and helped to get him elected.

Vote all you want — The Illuminati will always win the elections

By Makia Freeman, Guest author, HumansAreFree.com