Remedies for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancers and Other Life Threatening Diseases.


By Craig Grant and Nancy Coulson

Whatever you do, don’t go the chemo. Just an opinion.
Cancer is the world’s #2 industry, after Big Oil.
Big Pharma has a lot invested in making sure it stays that way.
More on that later.

Here’s how I cured my cancer.

First I did some checking around and found an ashram that only serves vegetarian food from their own garden. I didn’t trust myself not to give in and have a bag of potato chips and a glass of wine when I was steeped in self-pity. (Potato chips and booze are two of cancer’s biggest friends.)
And once I got to the ashram, I started doing some research.

Rife was the starting point for me, and I managed to create my own device from the raw materials at the ashram. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist. Details are on-line. (The internet will be the tool that ultimately derails Big Pharma’s death-grip on with-holding long-repressed alternative cancer cures. I do solemnly predict.

And then I did more research and came up with my own Rife-Barr device.

Of course, all cancers are unique in their own fashion.

You may wish to also consider the much less fussy and less expensive protocols that Dr. Bob Beck came up with is the most bang for the buck and all of the devices he designed are for sale at Sota Instruments, as of today, at least, a company of worldwide fame that operates out of Revelstoke, B.C. They are severely limited as to what they are permitted to post on their website by the feds, who are sooooo skeered of Big Pharma, so you have to look around to be able to even figure out how they work.
Beck has 4 synergystic ways of attacking disease:

1) Blood purification: you wear a device on your wrist
and all the blood that flows by gets charged,
deactivating all manner of pathogens. The result is
that your immune system is fully restored, since it
isn’t so busy fighting pathogens. I think that the
term “immune system” itself is a misnomer. There are a
great number of other functions that the immune system
does than provide immunity.

2) colloidal silver: this goes where flowing blood
doesn’t to help destroy pathogens.
Note: the device called the “silver pulser” does both
of the above functions. Even if you don’t want to
ingest colloidal silver there are all kinds of other
reasons that you would want a supply.

3) Magnetic pulser: This is a big unit that you put
over local infections or tumors or suspected
bacerial/viral/fungal strong-holds, like lymph, organs,
sties, pustules,etc. Gives a larger discharge in
specific target areas. Works specifically to
complement the silver pulser.

4) Ozone: people that drink lots of ozonated water
don’t suffer the same detox effects that others do
when using these machines. Ozone on its own does a lot
of good. Apparently it’s powers are enhanced when used
in concert with these devices.

The effect of doing all of the above would be to
eliminate a couple of pounds of active micro-pathogens
and also move your pH towards the alkaline.
Apparently when people do these 4 things, they get
better from aids, chronic fatigue,lupus,etc.(please
eat this message as I can be shot for having made
these statements)

Of course there are lots of new-groups out there on the web devoted to alternative cancer cures. You owe it to yourself to check out at least a few.
I wrote this to the newsgroup in response to
a lady that needs help with cancer and has very little
money. I didn’t include EVERYTHING, just what sprung
to mind without reviewing my list of favorite websites.
So there is lots of other stuff I’m forgetting for the
moment, but I’ll go look at what it is and write an

There may be people who live nearby that could help
you by loaning you their equipment if you can’t
purchase your own. Particularly useful would be the afore-mentioned
Rife machine, silver pulser, magnetic pulser, ozonator,
alkalizer, frequency generator, and/or zapper.
Otherwise, some of the most inexpensive treatments
that may help fight cancer that I can think of are:

1) Strenuously work to achieving an alkaline body
chemistry, optimally pH 7.4 (Otto Warbug won 2 Nobel
prizes for medicine for detailing the etiology of
cancer and how to treat cancer by changing the
condition of the body from acid to alkaline)

a) eat grapes, seeds and all. You may try a grape
fast, eating nothing but grapes.

b) try to find someone nearby with an alkalizer. An
alkalizer is a device that changes normal tap water
into quite alkaline water. It doesn’t take long to
make the water alkaline, so someone may let you come
by and get big containers of water from them.
(otherwise an alkalizer can cost up to $500.00 USD

c) Get food grade 35% hydrogen peroxide and add a
cup of it to your bathwater. It cleanses and

d) see if someone can loan you an ozonator. You
bubble the ozone into water and drink the water. Works
well with alkaline water.

2) Take frequent saunas. One of the 4 protocols in the
Physician’s Handbook, one that ranks right up there
according to the gurus of allopathic medicine with
chemo, radiation, and surgery is hyperthermia. Cancer
cells can’t shed heat like normal cells and expire
when heated. Another benefit is that you detoxify.
Then quench your thirst with alkaline water.

3) Find someone with a Kombucha mushroom. You can brew
huge amounts of your own kombucha tea for the cost of
black tea and white sugar. Kombucha tea is rich in B
vitamins, but more importantly, it is also rich in
glyco uric acid. This is the stuff that your liver
creates to latch onto toxins in your bloodstream in
order to expell them.

4) Don’t overlook the power of the mind. Find someone
to help you make a tape that will induce hypnosis.
Once in this state you visualize the cancer as some
dark force and your body fighting it with victorious
fighters (like Jedi or something).Keep visualizing the
cancer as something that is being beaten and

5) Do basic organ cleanses:

a) Colon: get Dr. Jensen’s book on deep tissue
cleansing. He recommends using a doing a special diet
including psyllium seed, bentonite clay, digestive
enzymes, special foods and drink and then doing two
“colemas” per day. This is a good idea for anybody.

b) liver cleanse

c) kidney cleanse
-the colon program can take anywhere from 10 days to
about 3 months. The other cleanses are relatively

6)Augmenting nutrition is always a good idea. You can
grow wheat grass for yourself and get a special juicer
to process it. Wheat grass must be consumed fresh
because the “goodness” has about a 4hour half-life.
Wheat grass is rich with enzymes, chlorophyll, and
replete with most vitamins, minerals, etc. This is a
very cost-effective investment in nutrition, and you
could probably even find people who would want to
purchase fresh wheat grass juice from you or purchase
flats of wheatgrass for themselves to juice.

7) There are some foods that have some naturally
occurring laetril in them (like fresh “natural”
almonds)Laetril is a B vitamin that has arsenic woven
into its structure. It goes to the site of any
cancers in the body and exposes the cancer to the
arsenic. It is an organic natural “silver bullet”.
There are other cleansing diets and herbal regemens
that you may be able to imitate. Learn about the
Essiac formula, the Hoxley remedies, The Gerson diet,
etc. There have been successes using cottage cheese
and omega fatty acid diets, carrot juice fasts, as
well as the aforementioned grape fast.

8) Check out the price of a product called 714-X
invented by Dr Nassems. This is as close to a
relatively cheap “cure” as one can find.

9) Look into getting DMSO

10) There are also other things that seem to work
pretty well. There are 3 network marketing companies
that market things that are effective in returning
people to health who have a wide variety of life
threatening conditions.

1) Mannatech: their Ambrotose radically improves
immune response. The immune system is then capable of
“seeing” and destroying cancerous cells, and other
pathogens like candida, or infections, etc. There are
many testimonials from people who had cancer who have
recovered their health by consuming large amounts of
ambrotose. Expensive but pretty effective. There is a
website dedicated to peer reviewed 3rd person double
blind experiments. Google Mannatech Ambrotose cancer,
more information.

2) Tahitian Noni juice: This is an offering of
Morinda international. The juice contains in abundance
an alkaloid that is necessary for virtally every
nitrogen-based biochemical reaction in the body,
impacting protein metabolism, hormone regulation,
etc.There are other “noni” juices out there, but they
aren’t processed in a way that the nutritional value
would be intact. There are hundreds of other nutrients
in the noni juice that research has only just begun to
understand.Expensive, but useful. General tonic effect
with some testimonial evidence of its effectiveness
with cancer.

3) Prime One: is a blend of “adaptogens”. These are
naturally occuring substances that work with the
endocrine system to normalize the production of
cortisol. Cortisol levels rise to detrimental levels
in response to stress. Returning cortisol levels to
normal tends to reduce or even eliminate stress. These
adaptogens are the result of over 50 years and
literally billions of dollars of research in the
Soviet Union. Again, expensive.

There are other products and other approaches that
may be useful, but are either expensive or not quite
available for the public yet. There is promising work
being done now where a relatively mild virus, like the
cold virus, is injected, and appears to attack the
cancer.not available yet, I think. Also, there is
ozone therapy, where you sit in a one-person sauna and
then pump ozone into the enclosure. Ozone is
opportunistic. It will react with whatever it can.
Your regular cells are protected, but cancer cells are
oxidized/destroyed. Another benefit of ozone therapy
is that artifical contaminants like ddt (for instance)
are broken down into their composite parts and can be
swept out of the body. Even metals are oxidized and
removed. Pretty expensive.

This is a collection of testimonials from people who have found benefits from using the “Beck Protocols” and the Flaxseed Oil list which is loaded with helpful info re: the Dr. Johanna protocol of Flax-seed oil and
low fat cottage cheese. This simple protocol is within everyone`s financial reach and is extremely effective against cancer and other life threatening diseases. Dr. Budwig has saved countless people even when they were at death`s doorstep, and their doctors had given them up as lost causes.

Here are inexpensive nutritional diet supplementals and websites that can help, at least as of today, so get on them fast, Big Pharma has a big vacuum cleaner that likes to suck up sites like these in a nano-flash:

Pau D’Arco @
MGB-3 Lane Labs @
Shark Cartilage @ 1-800-510-2010
Apricot Pits @ (Jim Clark) (502) 937-2492

If I was in that situation and had little money, I
would definitely follow the Gerson program which
includes a strictly organic fruit and vegetable diet
and mass quantities of organic vegetable/wheat-grass
juices. I would also do some juice fasting. You can
check out their site at; also, check out this.

The truth about essiac was published a few years back in a
meticulously researched book by Sheila Snow and Mali Klein with
the title “ESSIAC:The secrets of Rene Caisse’s Herbal Pharmacy”, published by Gill and Macmillan Ltd., Dublin, ISBN 0-7171-3228-5.

To read the archives go to

Do Killer Microbes Cause Breast Cancer?
Suppressed and Forgotten Research Could Hold the Key to a Cure for this Dread Disease

Despite a century of cancer research the cause of breast cancer remains, strangely unknown, allegedly. Age, diet, stress, hormone factors, genetic predisposition, and cancer viruses are all suspected as possible causative factors, but totally ignored are infectious bacteria which have been implicated in breast cancer and other forms of cancer.

A century ago when major diseases like tuberculosis, leprosy, and syphilis
were discovered to be bacterial (not viral) infections, many physicians
suspected bacteria might also cause cancer. At the close of the nineteenth
century (when the science of microbiology was in its infancy), many different microbes were cultured from cancer. Variously called “cancer coccidia,” “sporozoons” and “cancer parasites,” a few of these
microbes produced cancer tumors when injected into animals. But many did not, and most doctors finally assessed these cancer germs as laboratory “contaminants” or as “secondary invader microbes” that infect the tissue after the cancer is already formed.

The idea of a cancer parasite was finally dismissed in 1919 by noted American pathologist James Ewing. In his popular textbook, Neoplastic Diseases, he declared: “Few competent observers consider it
(the parasitic theory) as a possible explanation in cancer.” In Ewing’s opinion, cancer did not act like an infection. Therefore, he concluded that microbes couldn’t possibly cause it. He wrote: “The general facts of the genesis of tumors are strongly against the possibility of a parasitic origin.” Subsequently, few doctors dared to contradict Ewing by investigating bacteria in cancer.

Nevertheless, during the 1920s a few persistent physicians like pathologist John Nuzum of the University of Illinois College of Medicine; surgeon Michael Scott from Butte, Montana; and obstetrician James Young of Edinburgh, Scotland, continued to publish research showing that bacteria were implicated in breast cancer and other forms of cancer.

Working independently of one another, all three researchers cultured unusual bacteria from breast cancer, as well as from breast cancer tumors in mice. The peculiar growth of the “pleomorphic” cancer germ defied the established laws of microbiology by its ability to change shape and form, depending on how it was cultured in the laboratory, as well as the amount of oxygen supplied for growth and the age of the culture.

At first, the germ was barely visible as tiny round coccal forms. Later, these cocci enlarged into rod-shaped bacteria, which could connect together to form chains resembling a fungus. Small cocci could also enlarge into larger yeast and fungal-like spore forms.

Nuzum grew his “micrococcus” from 38 of 41 early breast cancers, and from the cancerous lymph nodes and metastatic tumors resulting from spread of the cancer to other parts of the body. During his 6 years of intensive bacteriological study, he learned the microbe could pass through a filter designed to hold back bacteria, indicating that some forms of the microbe were as small as the size of some viruses. With
special stains he detected these small round coccoid forms within the breast cancer tumor cells. Although Nuzum couldn’t produce cancer tumors in mice, he was able to induce breast cancer tumors in 2 of 5 dogs
injected with the microbe.

In a dangerous human experiment he injected the groin of a 70-year-old man with the bacteria he cultured from breast cancer. After 62 injections over an 18-week period, a skin cancer formed in the man’s groin. This experiment showed that breast cancer microbes were also capable of producing a different kind of cancer, such as skin cancer.

Young found his microbe in 16 cases of breast cancer, and in two mice with breast cancer. He identified “spore forms” and clumped “spore balls” in microscopic sections prepared from the mouse tumors.

Scott described three stages in the life cycle of his parasite: rod forms, spore or coccus-like forms, and large spore-sacs resembling a fungus. He treated cancer patients with an effective antiserum against these microbes, and spent the rest of his life trying to alert his colleagues to the infectious cause of cancer. But the antagonism of the medical profession to Scott’s cancer parasites and his antiserum was overwhelming, and he died a forgotten man.

During the last half of this century cancer microbe research was barely kept alive by a quartet of women, now all dead. The published research of Virginia Wuerthele-Caspe Livingston-Wheeler (a physician),Eleanor Alexander-Jackson (a microbiologist), Irene Diller (a cellular biologist) and Florence Seibert (a chemist) provides indisputable evidence that bacteria are implicated in cancer.

Livingston, who never let the male-dominated medical profession intimidate her, independently discovered the cancer microbe in the late 1940s and never stopped talking about it until her death in 1990, at the age of 84. Aided by Alexander-Jackson, who supplied the bacteriologic expertise, they became an unstoppable research team. The two women found a special stain (the acid-fast stain) that allowed the microbe to be recognized in culture and within the cancer tumor. Like the researchers back in the 1920s, they confirmed the microbe was filterable; and electron microscopic photos provided further proof that the filterable forms were indeed viral-size. Livingston named the microbe “Progenitor cryptocides” (Greek for the hidden-killer), which angered cancer experts, microbiologists, and American Cancer Society spokespersons, all of whom
insisted the cancer microbe did not exist! Yeah, right.

In the 1950s Irene Diller of the Institute for Cancer Research at Fox Chase, Philadelphia, discovered fungus-like microbes in cancer cells. Joining forces with the Livingston team, Diller worked with specially
bred mice with a proven cancer incidence. By injecting them with microbes cultured from breast cancer and other tumors, she was able to more than double the cancer incidence of the mice.

She injected healthy animals with cancer bacteria.

When cancer tumors developed she successfully cultured the microbe from the tumors – thus proving that these bacteria were implicated in the production of cancer. Utilizing Livingston’s methods, Diller also grew
the microbe from the blood of cancer patients.

In the early 1960s Florence Seibert became so impressed with Diller’s research that she quit retirement to help prove that bacteria causecancer. Back in the 1920s Seibert devised a method to make intravenous
transfusions safe by eliminating contaminating ubiquitous bacteria. Later, as one of the foremost authorities investigating the chemistry and immunology of the acid-fast bacteria that cause tuberculosis, she
perfected the skin test for tuberculosis that has been used worldwide ever since.

In 1938, she was awarded the famed Trudeau Medal, the highest prize given to tuberculosis research.

Experiments conducted by Seibert and her research team showed these acid-fast and TB-like cancer microbes were not laboratory contaminants because they were able to isolate bacteria from every piece of tumor (and every acute leukemic blood) they studied.

In her autobiography, Pebbles on the Hill of a Scientist, published privately in 1968, she wrote: “One of the most interesting properties of these bacteria is their great pleomorphism. For example, they readily change their shape from round cocci, to elongated rods, and even to thread-like filaments depending upon what medium they grow on and how long they grow. This may be one of the reasons why they have been overlooked or considered to be heterogenous contaminants… And even more interesting than this is the fact that these bacteria have a filterable form in their life cycle; that is, that they can become so small that they pass
through bacterial filters which hold back bacteria. This is what viruses do, and is one of the main criteria of a virus, separating them from bacteria. But the viruses also will not live on artificial media like these bacteria do. They need body tissue to grow on. Our filterable form, however, can be recovered again on ordinary artificial bacterial media and will grow on these. This should interest the virus workers very much and should cause them to ask themselves how many of the viruses may not be filterable forms of our bacteria.”

Seibert’s provocative papers, some emanating from the prestigious Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, should have caused a stir. But with the quartet slowly closing in on the infectious cause of cancer, funds from previous supporters (like the American Cancer Society) suddenly dried up.

All cancer microbe researchers eventually discovered that studying cancer bacteria was the kiss of death as far as funding was concerned. And without adequate funding, this type of cancer research was made more difficult.

But coming from thirty years of research into the acid-fast bacteria that cause tuberculosis, Seibert knew that the discovery of a pleomorphic and acid-fast microbe in cancer was tremendously important. She fervently believed that knowledge of this microbe would be instrumental in developing a possible vaccine and more effective antibiotic therapy against cancer. In Pebbles she confided: “It is very difficult to understand the lack of interest, instead of great enthusiasm, that should follow such results, a lack of certainty not in the tradition of good science. The contrast between the progress made in tuberculosis where we know the cause, where we have good general diagnostic tests, where we have a vaccine and effective antibiotic controls, and that made in cancer with the millions invested, is very striking. Some dedicated scientists should indeed find it rewarding to confirm or deny these painstaking and time-consuming experiments, for the sake of establishing the first necessary step in the important problem of the etiology of cancer.”

Like the other women, Seibert observed the virus-like forms of the cancer microbe within the nucleus of the cancer cells. She theorized this infection could disrupt and transform nuclear genetic material that could lead to malignant change. Even though cancer microbes might appear to be simple and common microbes, their ability to infiltrate the nucleus of cells meant they were far from harmless.

In 1990, at the age of 92, Florence Seibert was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame, along with Barbara Jordan (Government), Billie Jean King (Athletics) and Margaret Bourke-White (Arts).

When she died the following year, her passage was noted in Time and People magazines, and in major newspapers like The Los Angeles Times. All the obituaries mentioned her contributions to the safety of intravenous fluids and her great achievement with the TB skin test. But not a word was written about her cancer microbe research, to which she devoted the last thirty years of her life.

Each year 190,000 American women are diagnosed with breast cancer. And the prognosis is still dismal for women whose breast cancer has spread to the lymph nodes and beyond. Yet the medical establishment
remains adamantly and irrationally opposed to cancer microbe research. It is perhaps understandable from an economic viewpoint that the medical profession would not welcome a proposed infectious cause of cancer that would challenge the highly lucrative multi-billion-dollar cancer industry.

Physicians confidently ignore cancer bacteria because they have been carefully taught in medical school that there are no significant bacteria detectable in cancer. They still believe that cancer microbes represent contaminant bacteria or bacteria of no significance.

Thus, published reports of cancer microbe research are rarely cited and the subject remains virtually unknown.

The idea of a microbe with virus, bacteria, and fungal-like stages is also anathema to most doctors. However, over the past several decades the study of cell-wall deficient bacteria and “mycoplasma-like” bacteria (which are both bacterial and viral-like) indicates that microbes indeed have a complex life cycle. In 1919, when Ewing offered his damning opinion of cancer parasites, none of these microbiologic peculiarities were even

In some instances, cancer microbe research appears to be deliberately suppressed. For example, the National Cancer Institute on its “cancer Facts” web page
informs viewers about Virginia Livingston and states: “There is no scientific evidence to confirm her theories of cancer causation or to justify her treatments.” Obviously, this official judgement is a blatant lie
because, as we have noted, Livingston’s discoveries have been confirmed by many competent scientists.

In addition, Livingston has written three books on the cancer microbe:
Cancer: A New Breakthrough (1972), The Microbiology of
Cancer (1977), and The Conquest of Cancer (1984).15-17 More recent books on bacteria in cancer include Alan Cantwell’s The Cancer Microbe (1990) and Can Bacteria Cause Cancer? (1997) by David J Hess.

Using acid-fast staining techniques, bacteria have been identified in breast cancer, lymphoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma (the so-called “gay cancer” of AIDS) and other forms of cancer.

Bacteria identified in breast cancer indicate that such microbes are already
present within the tumor and are not laboratory contaminants. Microbes have also been identified in “normal” and cancer-free breast tissue removed at the time of surgery. This suggests that the bacteria are not “secondary invaders” because they are identifiable in areas before the tissue has been invaded by cancer.

The current lack of knowledge about the cause of advanced breast cancer has resulted in the recommendation of some very expensive and death-defying treatments for this horrendous disease. Bone marrow transplants, which carry a 5% death rate, are being proposed as a routine treatment, at a minimal cost of $100,000 per patient.

As described in Karen Stabiner’s To Dance With the Devil: The New War on Breast Cancer (1997), the procedure is not pretty. First, a catheter is placed in a woman’s chest to deliver the drugs. A surgical treatment is then performed to scrape out bone marrow from her pelvis, followed by 7 days of growth hormone injections. Then starts days of intravenous chemotherapy that can cause kidney and bladder damage. A catheter is placed in the bladder, followed by a round of intravenous BCNU, or carmustine, a drug that makes a woman feel like she is falling down drunk. Patients become sleepy, sullen, disoriented, agitated, and angry. Loss of bowel control and vomiting are common. After all this, women are put into isolation because the white count drops precipitously, making her vulnerable to all sorts of infections. There may be inexplicable spiking fevers and rashes, and the inevitable loss of hair. After three weeks, patients are allowed to go home where they are told to watch for, “interstitial pneumonitis,” a potentially fatal after-effect if not diagnosed and treated early.

Bone marrow transplant for breast cancer is not guaranteed, nor is it considered a cure. Women have been known to die of cancer three months after the procedure, proving that some patients do not respond to chemotherapy no matter how high the dose.

Even with radiation, chemotherapy and surgery, the cost of dying of cancer is not cheap. At the price patients are paying, physicians should not have the luxury of being ignorant about cancer microbe research, particularly when these microbes can be identified in cancer tumors.

With 40,000 American women dying annually from breast cancer, it is time medical science re-evaluated the parasite of cancer that James Ewing so casually dismissed in 1919. Perhaps if he hadn’t been so adamant about cancer microbe research, his colleagues might have been able to do more to save him when he himself eventually died of “the Big C.”

A friend of mine on a certain anti-cancer list has just found out that her daughter-in-law has lung cancer, or a tumor on the lung, I am not sure. The problem is made worse by a gallbladder that the medical establishment
says needs to come out.

Sheila – an old friend from university days – was diagnosed with lung cancer in her 30’s and underwent a few months of chemo but got so weak and ill she and her boyfriend refused to continue it.

Instead she started drinking Essiac tea (Flor-essence brand) before every meal.

Her tumor stopped growing according to x-rays. Couple of years later she had an abdominal tumor with intestinal blockage. She added MGN-3, which is a concentrated form of Shiitake medicinal mushrooms, which strengthen the immune system and especially the killer cells that attack cancer cells. Other beneficial medicinal mushrooms are Maitake and Reishi. Anyway that was 4 years ago, and she’s still around.

A low-cost approach to cancer and wellness is to make green drinks for chlorophyll and other healing substances. Wheat, barley, or other grains can be sprouted indoors on trays and juiced, or it’s easier to
grow them outside in a large pot or piece of ground, sowing thickly and cutting off some to juice. My form of juicing is to put them in a blender with water, blend for a while to break up the grass, then strain off the green juices in water and drink. I am blessed with a lot of medicinal wild herbs in my yard that are good medicinals and also gather and juice them- red clover, cleavers, ribwort, plantain, stinging nettle, burdock, and also grow rosemary, oregano, lemon balm, mints, Houttuynia, wormwood, and comfrey (only use leaves) to juice. I believe in eating to minimize degenerative diseases (avoid white flour and sugar, and most concentrated carbohydrates that elevate the blood sugar level and favor production of bad prostaglandins as mentioned in the Zone Diet; eat a lot of raw vegetables and sprouts, a variety of different colors of raw fruits, Shiitake mushrooms to build the immune system, and raw nuts soaked to make them more chewable). Eating a diet to prevent cancer makes more sense than eating badly then changing after you get it. Some you can look up are the Hallelujah Acres diet, Elizabeth Baker’s Uncook book, and Ann Wigmore’s raw diet featuring lots of sprouts and fermented foods. These diets are by people who cured their or other people’s cancers with them.


Ewing J: The parasitic theory. In, Ewing J (Ed):
Neoplastic Diseases (Ed1).
Saunders, Philadelphia, 1919, pp 114-126.
Nuzum JW: A critical study of an organism associated

For theories on how some bioelectrical devices may
work see “Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens”
in the “Bioelectronics/Introduction to Bioelectronics”
section at This
section also includes the articles “Introduction to
Rife Bare” and Recommendations for those who want to
explore bioelectronics.

For a short overview on many alternative
bioelectrical devices, see “Zappers and Other Gizmos” in the
“Healing with Electronics” section at Richard Loyd’s website

Don Tunney started Rife Technology Inc. It is the most
popular manufacturer of complete Rife-Bare devices,
but as of July 2002, they were ordered to stop
selling them. They are still able to sell the premodified
and specially built components to make building them
oneself easier:

Garrett Trebing’s Vibrant Health also offers complete
Bare- Rife units

For frequency lists for Rife-Bare or other frequency
devices, including the Consolidated Annotated
Frequency List (CAFL) which is the most popular “master list”
for rife researchers, see

The “Bioelectronics/Frequencies and Anecdotes”
section also contains the “Non-Consolidated Frequency List”,
plus a Frequency Cross Reference, Reports, and Anecdotes.

Also, check out something called MMS.
Lots of people have had good luck with it.
You mix a drop or two from a couple of bottles, wait a minute, mix it with lime juice, drink it. That simple. It somehow brings the cancer to the surface, then you hit it with Black Amazon salve, still available on the web as I write this.
But now, of course, MMS is illegal in Canada.

A final thought: George Harrison’s £140 million fortune did not save him; the doctors did use the most advanced chemotherapy. THEY used the MOST ADVANCED CHEMO.

Hope some of this helps.



Though they outlawed MMS in Canada last year, as I said,but, if you’re diligent, and persevere, if you google MMS and killing cancer, and go down far enough, you might be able to come up with a site down some back alley in the web that will offer up something like this…… Or at least find a book about MMS on Amazon.